@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix kmgbf: <http://metadata.cbd.int/kmgbf/> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix schema: <http://schema.org/> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix ns0: <http://metadata.cbd.int/kmgbf/ontology#> .
@prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .

<http://metadata.cbd.int/kmgbf/ontology#custodianAgency>
  rdfs:comment "The international organization responsible for compiling and reporting data for this indicator, as designated in the KMGBF monitoring framework guidance (CBD/COP/16/INF/3/Rev.1, field 10a). Parallel to sdg:custodianAgency in the UN SDG ontology."@en ;
  rdfs:label "custodian agency"@en .

kmgbf:kmgbfScheme
  a skos:ConceptScheme ;
  skos:prefLabel "Objetivos y metas del MCBKM"@es, "Objectifs et cibles du CBDMK"@fr, "KMGBF Goals and Targets"@en, "Marco Mundial de Biodiversidad de Kunming-Montreal"@es, "Cadre mondial de la biodiversite de Kunming-Montreal"@fr, "Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework"@en .

kmgbf:indicatorScheme
  a skos:ConceptScheme ;
  skos:prefLabel "KMGBF Monitoring Framework Indicators"@en .

skos:prefLabel rdfs:subPropertyOf schema:name .
skos:notation rdfs:subPropertyOf schema:identifier .
<http://metadata.cbd.int/kmgbf/ontology#indicatorCode>
  rdfs:comment "The unique identifier for the indicator following official patterns: {Goal/Target}.{number} for headline (e.g., A.1, 1.1), {Goal/Target}.b for binary (e.g., B.b, 1.b), {Goal/Target}.CT.{number} for component (e.g., A.CT.1, 2.CT.1), {Goal/Target}.CY.{number} for complementary (e.g., A.CY.1, 1.CY.1)."@en ;
  rdfs:label "código del indicador"@es, "code de l'indicateur"@fr, "indicator code"@en ;
  rdfs:subPropertyOf skos:notation .

<http://metadata.cbd.int/kmgbf/ontology#isHeadlineFor>
  rdfs:comment "Links an indicator to the goal(s) or target(s) for which it serves as a headline indicator. Headline indicators are primary quantitative indicators that all Parties are requested to use in their national reports (Annex I of Decision 16/31)."@en ;
  rdfs:label "es indicador principal para"@es, "est l'indicateur principal pour"@fr, "is headline indicator for"@en .

<http://metadata.cbd.int/kmgbf/ontology#Indicator>
  a owl:Class ;
  rdfs:label "Indicador"@es, "Indicateur"@fr, "Indicator"@en .

kmgbf:indicator_B.1
  a skos:Concept, <http://metadata.cbd.int/kmgbf/ontology#Indicator> ;
  ns0:custodianAgency "United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD)" ;
  ns0:indicatorCode "B.1" ;
  ns0:isHeadlineFor kmgbf:goal_B, kmgbf:target_11 ;
  dc:source "https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-16/cop-16-dec-31-en.pdf" ;
  skos:broader kmgbf:goal_B, kmgbf:target_11 ;
  skos:definition "The proposed indicator is defined as the average rate of change in the provision of a set of ecosystem services in a particular time period compared to a baseline year, for a country or globally. The concepts, definitions and classifications used in this indicator are based on the SEEA Ecosystem Accounting statistical standard that was adopted by the United Nations Statistical Commission in March 2021.12 Ecosystem services are defined as the contributions of ecosystems to the benefits that are used in economic and other human activity, while benefits are defined as the goods and services that are ultimately used and enjoyed by people and society. For accounting purposes, the focus is usually on final ecosystem services only, which are those ecosystem services in which the user of the service is an economic unit (i.e. business, government or household)13. In ecosystem accounting, ecosystem services are conceptualised as flows between ecosystem assets and economic units. This results in an alignment between supply and use (i.e. supply needs to match use of a particular service), which is a foundational accounting concept. This means that an ecosystem service is recorded in the tables only when it is used. Explained differently, ecosystem services must actually be used to be included in the account, while ecosystem services that could potentially be used are excluded. For the purpose of this indicator the terms “supply of ecosystem services” and “ecosystem service supply” are avoided as they do not capture the use aspect of ecosystem services. Rather, the terms ecosystem service provision or provision of ecosystem services are used, with the intention of capturing the combination of supply and use that characterises ecosystem services in an accounting context. The account table follows a standard structure, shown in Table 7.1 of SEEA Ecosystem Accounting. The total area for which the accounts are compiled is called the ecosystem accounting area. For the purposes of this indicator, the ecosystem accounting area should be the total area of the country. For countries that have marine territory, the total surface area of the country could be divided into separate ecosystem accounting areas, for example one for the land and inland water area and another for the territorial waters (sea area to the end of the exclusive economic zone). Further guidance on this will be provided in compilation guidelines to be developed. Ecosystem services are commonly grouped as provisioning, regulating and maintenance, and cultural services. SEEA Ecosystem Accounting includes a reference list of ecosystem services, grouped according to these broad categories, which has been adopted as part of the SEEA Ecosystem Accounting international statistical standard. There was detailed and extensive consultation on the development of this reference list and cross walks exist with all other major ecosystem services classifications. Within provisioning services, the SEEA Ecosystem Accounting reference list identifies ten sub-types of ecosystem services; within regulating services there are sixteen sub-types; and within cultural services there are five sub-types. SEEA Ecosystem Accounting uses the IUCN’s Global Ecosystem Typology as the reference classification for ecosystem types, which was also endorsed by the United Nations Statistical Commission at its 55th session in March 2024 as an international statistical classification and recommended it to be included in the international family of classifications. Parties are able to use their national ecosystem classifications as the basis for their ecosystem accounts and ideally to cross-walk national ecosystem types to the Ecosystem Functional Groups (Level 3) of the Global Ecosystem Typology. The biophysical ecosystem services accounts describe the flows of ecosystem services provided by ecosystem assets, grouped according to ecosystem type, in volume terms per accounting period. Metrics from the accounts are commonly in physical units such as cubic meters or tonnes. Indicators that can be derived from the account tables include percentage change over an accounting period or with respect to a baseline period. The biophysical quantity for each ecosystem service may also be expressed in monetary terms where monetary valuation of the service is undertaken. Monetary valuation in an accounting context is approached differently to monetary valuation in environmental economics, and includes only exchange values rather than both exchange values and welfare values. The monetary ecosystem services accounts describe the ecosystem services provided by the ecosystem asset in monetary terms per accounting period, which can be aggregated to a single monetary value per accounting period. Indicators that can be derived from the account tables include percentage change in value over an accounting period or with respect to a baseline period."@en ;
  skos:hiddenLabel "The proposed indicator is defined as the average rate of change in the provision of a set of ecosystem services in a particular time period compared to a baseline year, for a country or globally. The concepts, definitions and classifications used in this indicator are based on the SEEA Ecosystem Accounting statistical standard that was adopted by the United Nations Statistical Commission in March 2021.12 Ecosystem services are defined as the contributions of ecosystems to the benefits that are used in economic and other human activity, while benefits are defined as the goods and services that are ultimately used and enjoyed by people and society. For accounting purposes, the focus is usually on final ecosystem services only, which are those ecosystem services in which the user of the service is an economic unit (i.e. business, government or household)13. In ecosystem accounting, ecosystem services are conceptualised as flows between ecosystem assets and economic units. This results in an alignment between supply and use (i.e. supply needs to match use of a particular service), which is a foundational accounting concept. This means that an ecosystem service is recorded in the tables only when it is used. Explained differently, ecosystem services must actually be used to be included in the account, while ecosystem services that could potentially be used are excluded. For the purpose of this indicator the terms “supply of ecosystem services” and “ecosystem service supply” are avoided as they do not capture the use aspect of ecosystem services. Rather, the terms ecosystem service provision or provision of ecosystem services are used, with the intention of capturing the combination of supply and use that characterises ecosystem services in an accounting context. The account table follows a standard structure, shown in Table 7.1 of SEEA Ecosystem Accounting. The total area for which the accounts are compiled is called the ecosystem accounting area. For the purposes of this indicator, the ecosystem accounting area should be the total area of the country. For countries that have marine territory, the total surface area of the country could be divided into separate ecosystem accounting areas, for example one for the land and inland water area and another for the territorial waters (sea area to the end of the exclusive economic zone). Further guidance on this will be provided in compilation guidelines to be developed. Ecosystem services are commonly grouped as provisioning, regulating and maintenance, and cultural services. SEEA Ecosystem Accounting includes a reference list of ecosystem services, grouped according to these broad categories, which has been adopted as part of the SEEA Ecosystem Accounting international statistical standard. There was detailed and extensive consultation on the development of this reference list and cross walks exist with all other major ecosystem services classifications. Within provisioning services, the SEEA Ecosystem Accounting reference list identifies ten sub-types of ecosystem services; within regulating services there are sixteen sub-types; and within cultural services there are five sub-types. SEEA Ecosystem Accounting uses the IUCN’s Global Ecosystem Typology as the reference classification for ecosystem types, which was also endorsed by the United Nations Statistical Commission at its 55th session in March 2024 as an international statistical classification and recommended it to be included in the international family of classifications. Parties are able to use their national ecosystem classifications as the basis for their ecosystem accounts and ideally to cross-walk national ecosystem types to the Ecosystem Functional Groups (Level 3) of the Global Ecosystem Typology. The biophysical ecosystem services accounts describe the flows of ecosystem services provided by ecosystem assets, grouped according to ecosystem type, in volume terms per accounting period. Metrics from the accounts are commonly in physical units such as cubic meters or tonnes. Indicators that can be derived from the account tables include percentage change over an accounting period or with respect to a baseline period. The biophysical quantity for each ecosystem service may also be expressed in monetary terms where monetary valuation of the service is undertaken. Monetary valuation in an accounting context is approached differently to monetary valuation in environmental economics, and includes only exchange values rather than both exchange values and welfare values. The monetary ecosystem services accounts describe the ecosystem services provided by the ecosystem asset in monetary terms per accounting period, which can be aggregated to a single monetary value per accounting period. Indicators that can be derived from the account tables include percentage change in value over an accounting period or with respect to a baseline period."@en ;
  skos:inScheme kmgbf:indicatorScheme, kmgbf:kmgbfScheme ;
  skos:notation "B.1" ;
  skos:prefLabel "Services provided by ecosystems"@en, "Services rendus par les écosystèmes"@fr, "Servicios brindados por los ecosistemas"@es .

kmgbf:target_11
  a ns0:Target, skos:Concept ;
  ns0:hasHeadlineIndicator kmgbf:indicator_B.1 ;
  skos:narrower kmgbf:indicator_B.1 ;
  skos:prefLabel "Meta 11"@es, "Cible 11"@fr, "Target 11"@en .

kmgbf:goal_B
  a skos:Concept, ns0:Goal ;
  ns0:hasHeadlineIndicator kmgbf:indicator_B.1 ;
  skos:narrower kmgbf:indicator_B.1 ;
  skos:prefLabel "Objetivo B"@es, "Objectif B"@fr, "Goal B"@en .

