@prefix rdfs: . @prefix kmgbf: . @prefix skos: . @prefix schema: . @prefix owl: . @prefix ns0: . @prefix dc: . rdfs:comment "The international organization responsible for compiling and reporting data for this indicator, as designated in the KMGBF monitoring framework guidance (CBD/COP/16/INF/3/Rev.1, field 10a). Parallel to sdg:custodianAgency in the UN SDG ontology."@en ; rdfs:label "custodian agency"@en . kmgbf:kmgbfScheme a skos:ConceptScheme ; skos:prefLabel "Objetivos y metas del MCBKM"@es, "Objectifs et cibles du CBDMK"@fr, "KMGBF Goals and Targets"@en, "Marco Mundial de Biodiversidad de Kunming-Montreal"@es, "Cadre mondial de la biodiversite de Kunming-Montreal"@fr, "Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework"@en . kmgbf:indicatorScheme a skos:ConceptScheme ; skos:prefLabel "KMGBF Monitoring Framework Indicators"@en . skos:prefLabel rdfs:subPropertyOf schema:name . skos:notation rdfs:subPropertyOf schema:identifier . rdfs:comment "The unique identifier for the indicator following official patterns: {Goal/Target}.{number} for headline (e.g., A.1, 1.1), {Goal/Target}.b for binary (e.g., B.b, 1.b), {Goal/Target}.CT.{number} for component (e.g., A.CT.1, 2.CT.1), {Goal/Target}.CY.{number} for complementary (e.g., A.CY.1, 1.CY.1)."@en ; rdfs:label "código del indicador"@es, "code de l'indicateur"@fr, "indicator code"@en ; rdfs:subPropertyOf skos:notation . rdfs:comment "Links an indicator to the goal(s) or target(s) for which it serves as a headline indicator. Headline indicators are primary quantitative indicators that all Parties are requested to use in their national reports (Annex I of Decision 16/31)."@en ; rdfs:label "es indicador principal para"@es, "est l'indicateur principal pour"@fr, "is headline indicator for"@en . a owl:Class ; rdfs:label "Indicador"@es, "Indicateur"@fr, "Indicator"@en . kmgbf:indicator_1.1 a , skos:Concept ; ns0:custodianAgency "Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity", "GEOBON for the headline binary/categorical indicator" ; ns0:indicatorCode "1.1" ; ns0:isHeadlineFor kmgbf:target_1 ; dc:source "https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-16/cop-16-dec-31-en.pdf" ; skos:broader kmgbf:target_1 ; skos:definition "This indicator is linked to the corresponding headline binary/categorical indicator 1.1 \"Number of countries using participatory, biodiversity-inclusive spatial planning or effective management processes to address land and sea use change\" and is based on the same concepts and definitions (table 1). Table 1 Definition and concepts for indicator Conceptual basis Definition Biodiversity-inclusive: Biodiversity-inclusive is recognized in COP 8 Decision VIII/28 but not sufficient for headline binary/categorical indicator and this indicator. The definition of biodiversity-inclusive is expected to reflect the purpose of target 1 to mainstream biodiversity in spatial plans and in the planning process. “Inclusive” is not the same as prioritizing biodiversity for protection in plans. To be consistent with the definition and possible answers in the corresponding headline binary/categorical indicator, the definition aims at reflecting the different dimensions of biodiversity inclusive (e.g. protected areas, key biodiversity areas, ecological integrity). Biodiversity inclusive approach: \"taking into account all relevant information to safeguard biodiversity in spatial planning processes.\" Effective management process [addressing land- and sea-use change] The proposed definition is drawn upon the PAME definition (Hockings et. al 2006), making sure to capture and include traditional management areas (many of these concepts may overlap with OECMs but not registered as OECMs). Effective management process: “Activities through which evidence-based conservation outcomes are achieved.” Spatial planning Spatial planning is generally understood as a method or public process for identifying, analysing and allocating the spatial and temporal distribution of activities in a given environment in order to achieve various objectives, including social, economic and ecological (such as biodiversity), that have been specified through a political process. Spatial planning includes land-use planning, marine spatial planning, etc. Glossary for the first draft of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework (cbd.int) (from Land Use and Spatial Planning : Enabling Sustainable Management of Land Resources | SpringerLink, State of the ocean report 2022, Marine spatial planning: a step-by-step approach toward ecosystem-based management (UNESCO-IOC, 2009) and MSPglobal: international guide on marine/maritime spatial planning (UNESCO-IOC and European Commission, 2021)) Integrated spatial planning: \"a whole-of-government process to create land and sea use plans to achieve social, economic and ecological objectives for sustainable development.\" (modified by Integrated Spatial Planning Workbook | United Nations Development Programme (undp.org)) Participatory The definition is a synthesis of key concepts merging previously suggested definitions (such as \"rights-based governance\" in Springer et al. 2021 and the FAO/CFS Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure (VGGT), which is a document with high levels of legitimacy and that was the result of a long and consultative process with Parties). Participatory approaches to spatial planning \"involve stakeholders and rightsholders in all processes of decision-making and the long-term effective management, taking into account traditional knowledge, ensuring that the voices of rightsholders and particularly marginalized groups are appropriately taken into account, to support healthy ecosystems, social equity and human rights\"."@en ; skos:hiddenLabel "This indicator is linked to the corresponding headline binary/categorical indicator 1.1 \"Number of countries using participatory, biodiversity-inclusive spatial planning or effective management processes to address land and sea use change\" and is based on the same concepts and definitions (table 1). Table 1 Definition and concepts for indicator Conceptual basis Definition Biodiversity-inclusive: Biodiversity-inclusive is recognized in COP 8 Decision VIII/28 but not sufficient for headline binary/categorical indicator and this indicator. The definition of biodiversity-inclusive is expected to reflect the purpose of target 1 to mainstream biodiversity in spatial plans and in the planning process. “Inclusive” is not the same as prioritizing biodiversity for protection in plans. To be consistent with the definition and possible answers in the corresponding headline binary/categorical indicator, the definition aims at reflecting the different dimensions of biodiversity inclusive (e.g. protected areas, key biodiversity areas, ecological integrity). Biodiversity inclusive approach: \"taking into account all relevant information to safeguard biodiversity in spatial planning processes.\" Effective management process [addressing land- and sea-use change] The proposed definition is drawn upon the PAME definition (Hockings et. al 2006), making sure to capture and include traditional management areas (many of these concepts may overlap with OECMs but not registered as OECMs). Effective management process: “Activities through which evidence-based conservation outcomes are achieved.” Spatial planning Spatial planning is generally understood as a method or public process for identifying, analysing and allocating the spatial and temporal distribution of activities in a given environment in order to achieve various objectives, including social, economic and ecological (such as biodiversity), that have been specified through a political process. Spatial planning includes land-use planning, marine spatial planning, etc. Glossary for the first draft of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework (cbd.int) (from Land Use and Spatial Planning : Enabling Sustainable Management of Land Resources | SpringerLink, State of the ocean report 2022, Marine spatial planning: a step-by-step approach toward ecosystem-based management (UNESCO-IOC, 2009) and MSPglobal: international guide on marine/maritime spatial planning (UNESCO-IOC and European Commission, 2021)) Integrated spatial planning: \"a whole-of-government process to create land and sea use plans to achieve social, economic and ecological objectives for sustainable development.\" (modified by Integrated Spatial Planning Workbook | United Nations Development Programme (undp.org)) Participatory The definition is a synthesis of key concepts merging previously suggested definitions (such as \"rights-based governance\" in Springer et al. 2021 and the FAO/CFS Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure (VGGT), which is a document with high levels of legitimacy and that was the result of a long and consultative process with Parties). Participatory approaches to spatial planning \"involve stakeholders and rightsholders in all processes of decision-making and the long-term effective management, taking into account traditional knowledge, ensuring that the voices of rightsholders and particularly marginalized groups are appropriately taken into account, to support healthy ecosystems, social equity and human rights\"."@en ; skos:inScheme kmgbf:kmgbfScheme, kmgbf:indicatorScheme ; skos:notation "1.1" ; skos:prefLabel "Porcentaje de superficie terrestre y marina cubierta por planes espaciales que tienen en cuenta la diversidad biológica"@es, "Pourcentage de la surface terrestre et maritime faisant l’objet d’une planification spatiale respectueuse de la biodiversité"@fr, "Percentage of land and sea area covered by biodiversity-inclusive spatial plans"@en . kmgbf:target_1 a ns0:Target, skos:Concept ; ns0:hasHeadlineIndicator kmgbf:indicator_1.1 ; skos:narrower kmgbf:indicator_1.1 ; skos:prefLabel "Meta 1"@es, "Cible 1"@fr, "Target 1"@en .